AutoLogicTools

OBD-II code family

Throttle and Pedal Position Circuit Faults (30 codes)

30 related fault descriptions. Use each full code and the exact vehicle service information to identify its circuit, monitored condition, and required tests.

Codes in this family

This is the complete published member list for this guide. Each code retains its own page; shared diagnostic context does not mean that every member has the same test or repair.

What these codes mean

These thirty entries compare throttle/pedal position channels A, B, C, D, E and F. Each named channel retains circuit, range/performance, low, high and intermittent descriptions. Every complete code and title remains listed. The condition distinguishes the report; a channel label or shared guide is not a component diagnosis.

A letter does not establish a pedal location or the number of physical sensors. Ford’s covered gasoline systems illustrate both analog B monitoring and a digital SENT C sensor on a second electronic throttle body. Identify the actual component, signal technology, full DTC and any failure suffix before selecting a test. A basic scanner can omit information needed for that decision.

Circuit low/high describes an electrical finding, not throttle opening or fuel quantity. An unplugged input can have an expected bias, so a changed reading alone does not prove a short or failed sensor. Range/performance can involve relationships with another signal or with the operating condition. The covered Mitsubishi P0221 procedure, for example, includes air-flow/pressure plausibility and intake/MAF checks. Intermittent faults may require recording because a still measurement can miss the event.

Concrete pedal examples show why the exact monitor matters. The archived 2011 Tacoma 2TR-FE procedure describes P2120 and P2125 as rapid fluctuations of its main or sub pedal signal beyond malfunction thresholds. Its high-input P2123 trouble list includes an open circuit. The archived 2021 Audi A4 DPAA table instead describes P2121 and P2126 as SENT pedal-sensor internal self-check failures. These are bounded examples, not universal voltages, sensor ratios or directions for unplugging a connector.

Ford SSM 46829 identifies a particular harness-routing concern behind the brake booster to brake-pedal bracket on some 2015–2017 F-150 vehicles, with several pedal codes and possible other warning lamps. It directs ordinary diagnosis when that routing concern is absent. Multiple warnings therefore do not establish several failed sensors or justify replacing a pedal without checking the actual circuit.

The F examples make that application boundary concrete. Ford’s dated 2010 Gen2 summary uses APP-F for related electrical reports; the archived 2009 Viper P2132/P2133 entries instead identify TPS2/Bank2. F therefore does not universally locate a pedal track or auxiliary control. General circuit, range, low, high and intermittent results remain distinct, and an unreported neighbor does not certify the other circuits or signals.

Use the manufacturer’s permitted supply, return, signal/communication and component tests. Do not transfer analog resistance, voltage or jumper instructions to a digital sensor, force an electronic throttle plate or deliberately disturb live throttle wiring. Relearning is appropriate only where specified after its prerequisites are satisfied; it is not a substitute for diagnosis.

Judge urgency from actual response and warnings. Unpredictable acceleration, stalling or power loss that prevents safe operation requires a safe stop and assistance. The conditional throttle-body price on some member pages is a national replacement example, not a price to repair every code. Wiring, a pedal assembly, a separate sensor and a control fault are different possible jobs.

Identify the circuit on your vehicle

Match the full DTC, reporting module, and any failure-type suffix to the service information for your exact year, make, model, engine, and equipment. An identifier alone does not establish installed hardware count, location, connector pinout, or a universal measurement.

Where the manufacturer publishes its own meaning for this code, that is the one to work from — it describes the actual component on your vehicle, which the generic definition cannot. Keep the generic description for what it is good for: it tells you which subject area the standard assigned the code to, which is useful context when the two appear to disagree. If they do disagree, follow the manufacturer.

Editorial context

About This Diagnostic Information

These guides provide general diagnostic context. A trouble code records a condition detected by a control module. It does not automatically identify a failed part, and the right diagnostic procedure can vary by vehicle.

References for this guide

  • Ford 2024–2025 gasoline OBD summary, July 16, 2024 V2

    Referenced by P0120, P0121, P0122, P0123, P0124, P0220, P0221, P0222, P0223, P0224, P0225, P0226, P0227, P0228, P0229, P2120, P2122, P2123, P2125, P2126, P2127, P2128, P2129, P2131, P2134. P0120, P0121, P0122, P0123, P0124: Pages 103–104 distinguish analog throttle-position circuit/intermittent checks from digital SENT fault and communication monitoring. Applies only to covered Ford strategies, not every throttle or pedal sensor. P0220, P0221, P0222, P0223, P0224, P0225, P0226, P0227, P0228, P0229: PDF pages 103–105 distinguish analog B circuit/intermittent checks from digital SENT sensor C checks on covered dual-throttle applications. The exact full DTC and engine determine the monitor; these examples are not universal wiring tests. P2120, P2122, P2123, P2125: Cover and physical pages 101 and 106: D/E electrical, correlation and internal pedal-monitor categories are distinct, including complete-code suffixes. These examples do not define a universal transfer function or fallback. P2126: Physical PDF pages 100–101 distinguish fault-management responses, APP-E low/high circuits and separate D/E disagreement. Related comparison; these pages do not assign a universal P2126 monitor. P2127: Physical PDF pages 100–101 distinguish several fault responses, APP-E low input and separate D/E disagreement. P2128: Physical PDF pages 100–101 distinguish high-input checks, separate D/E disagreement and different fault-management responses. P2129, P2131, P2134: Physical PDF pages 100–101 and 103–106 distinguish pedal and throttle monitors, fault responses and analog/SENT implementations. These are bounded Ford examples.

  • Mitsubishi service information: P0121-00 main throttle-position plausibility

    Referenced by P0121. P0121: 2023 service-information application: compares modeled and measured engine air/load information, includes intake-leak and MAF checks, and describes restricted throttle fallback. Use its exact vehicle applicability.

  • SAE J2012, April 2002, historical throttle and pedal rows

    Referenced by P0220, P0221, P0222, P0223, P0224, P0225, P0226, P0227, P0228, P0229, P2120, P2121, P2122, P2123, P2124, P2125. P0220, P0221, P0222, P0223, P0224, P0225, P0226, P0227, P0228, P0229: PDF page 13 lists the B/C circuit, performance, low, high and intermittent entries. The names do not supply physical sensor locations, connector pins or universal test limits. P2120, P2121, P2122, P2123, P2124, P2125: Physical page 31, Table B13: historical fault categories and channel names. The entries do not establish installed hardware, diagnostic thresholds or repair instructions for a particular vehicle.

  • RepairPal throttle body replacement estimate

    Referenced by P0220, P0221, P0222, P0223. P0220, P0221, P0222, P0223: US national estimate updated September 3 and checked November 6, 2026: USD 623–766 parts and labor. Conditional throttle-body replacement example only, excluding taxes, fees, location variation and related work.

  • Mitsubishi 2022 P0221 sub-sensor plausibility procedure

    Referenced by P0221. P0221: Covered REEV22/2022 application: compares sensor-derived estimates with air-flow/manifold-pressure information, checks intake leakage and MAF foreign matter, and requires a special harness for sensor operation testing. Not a generic pedal or jumper procedure.

  • Archived 2011 Toyota Tacoma 2.7L pedal-monitor description

    Referenced by P2120, P2123, P2125. P2120, P2123, P2125: Covered Tacoma 4WD 2TR-FE description and DTC table distinguish channel fluctuations, low/high and correlation. P2120/P2125 include rapid-fluctuation criteria; the P2123 table includes an open circuit. These are application-specific examples, not generic pin or voltage tests.

  • Archived Audi 2021 A4 DPAA pedal-monitor table

    Referenced by P2121. P2121: Selected APP rows and table header: P2121 is a SENT sensor internal self-check, distinct from correlation and received-data reports. This is a covered table example, not a generic analog-ratio or network test.

  • Ford SSM 46829, selected 2015–2017 F-150 pedal-harness routing

    Referenced by P2122, P2123, P2124, P2125. P2122, P2123, P2124, P2125: Complete one-page message: a particular APP harness-routing concern can accompany several pedal codes and warning indicators. If that routing concern is absent, the message directs normal diagnosis; it does not establish a universal footwell cause.

  • Snap-on Diagnostic Trouble Codes catalogue

    Referenced by P2126, P2127, P2128, P2129, P2130, P2131, P2132, P2133, P2134. P2126: The published P2126 naming entry identifies this code description. Match it to the complete vehicle-specific scan result and reporting controller. P2127: The published P2127 naming entry identifies this code description. Match it to the complete vehicle-specific scan result and reporting controller. P2128: The published P2128 naming entry identifies this code description. Match it to the complete vehicle-specific scan result and reporting controller. P2129, P2130, P2131, P2132, P2133, P2134: The published naming entries distinguish the code, designator and reported condition. Match the complete manufacturer scan result to the installed vehicle.

  • Mazda3 ZJ/ZY/Z6, P2126 APP No. 2 procedure

    Referenced by P2126. P2126: Complete technical entry for versions with a throttle valve actuator: APP No. 2 duty-signal value and interval conditions. No universal analog ratio or owner road-test procedure.

  • Mazda2 ZJ/ZY, P2127:00 APP No. 2 low-input procedure

    Referenced by P2127. P2127: Complete ten-step entry and sole circuit diagram. The PCM supply/signal/return arrangement is application-specific; no generic pin, threshold or powered-disconnection test is assigned.

  • Ford 2023–2024 diesel OBD summary, August 25, 2023

    Referenced by P2127, P2128. P2127: Physical PDF page 97 separately lists the second pedal-track low-input condition and track correlation. No universal fallback or owner test is prescribed. P2128: Physical PDF page 97 separately lists the second pedal-track high-input condition and track correlation. No generic driveability guarantee or owner test.

  • Mazda3 ZJ/ZY/Z6, P2128 APP No. 2 high-input procedure

    Referenced by P2128. P2128: Complete entry and sole diagram for versions with a throttle valve actuator. Main-relay supply, signal/return design and diagnostic order are scoped examples; no universal numerical or pin test.

  • Ford 2010 gasoline OBD summary, electronic throttle control

    Referenced by P2130, P2131, P2132, P2133, P2134. P2130, P2131, P2132, P2133, P2134: The electronic-throttle chapter on physical pages 157–162 distinguishes Gen2 APP-F electrical reports and pedal/throttle correlation from later control generations.

  • 2009 Dodge Viper SRT-10 8.4L, P2132 diagnostic entry

    Referenced by P2130, P2132. P2130, P2132: The archived OEM entry supplies this specific vehicle’s monitor, named input and diagnostic prerequisites. It does not assign that hardware or test to other vehicles.

  • 2009 Dodge Viper SRT-10 8.4L, P2133 diagnostic entry

    Referenced by P2130, P2133. P2130, P2133: The archived OEM entry supplies this specific vehicle’s monitor, named input and diagnostic prerequisites. It does not assign that hardware or test to other vehicles.

Manufacturer service information, technical service bulletins, wiring diagrams, and vehicle-specific procedures should take precedence when available.

AutoLogicTools was founded by Vincent Fisk, an automotive locksmith and shop owner in San Diego with hands-on experience in vehicle keys, immobilizer systems, electrical issues, modules, programming, and diagnostics.